mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn
"Settled" Science?

Greens often tell us that the science of climate change is “settled”.  In broad outlines, perhaps — but the details, timing, and the interrelationship of key factors remain frustratingly obscure.

One of the hot green disaster scenarios is that melting Arctic ice will reach a “tipping point” in the near future.  The latest research suggests that this is a crock.   From the BBC:

[A Danish research team] found evidence that ice levels were about 50% lower 5,000 years ago. They say changes to wind systems can slow down the rate of melting. They argue, therefore, that a tipping point under current scenarios is unlikely.

For about 3,000 years…there was more open water and far less ice than today – probably less than 50% of the minimum Arctic sea ice recorded in 2007…Even with a loss of this size, the sea ice will not reach a point of no return.

Oh, and the polar bears seem to have survived this great melting quite nicely. Indeed, the biosphere as a whole seems to have adjusted to much greater temperature changes than anything now on the table.

This is a good thing; given the political and intellectual incoherence of the green movement, we are going to have to rely on nature more than on environmentalists to get us through whatever comes next.

Features Icon
show comments
© The American Interest LLC 2005-2016 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service