walter russell mead peter berger lilia shevtsova adam garfinkle andrew a. michta
Feed
Features
Reviews
Podcast
Published on: January 21, 2010
The Meaning of Massachusetts
show comments
  • Rellag

    Dr. Mead,

    This is this most brilliant piece of analysis I’ve read in a year.

    It is predictive of behavior, original, and its ahead of its time.

    Its an important piece of work.

    I urge you to seek wider dissemination.

    There are so many entrenched models that are providing horrible outcomes for the citizenry/ whether it is public education or the various manifestations of agency (vs. owner) capitalism.

    And the state always seems to show up to enhance and expand the entrenchment.

    Once you see it described as a pattern, as you’ve done above, its painfully obvious.

    Again, please seek greater dissemination.

  • Mrs. Davis

    Most Republicans, at least the professional politicians, don’t get it either.

  • Joshua Bay

    Dr. Mead,

    “Good sense is of all things in the world the most equally distributed, for everybody thinks he is so well supplied with it, that even those most difficult to please in all other matters never desire more of it than they already possess.” (Rene Descartes)

    How would you define well educated and enlightened? Does having a PHD qualify one as well educated? Is being well educated equal in exact proportion to being enlightened?

    I remember fondly my 2nd year in college; two separate professors who both happened to be heads of their departments. In each introductory course I asked the professor after class why what they were saying was the truth and why it was worth knowing. One professor’s response was, “It just is and if you don’t memorize it you’ll fail my course”. The other responded, “It isn’t the truth. It is a theory and it is based on these studies (…). If you don’t agree with these studies you should try to prove them wrong. The reason for learning them is to understand what we thought in the past, what we think now and to prepare you to discover what we will think in the future.” Needless to say both Professors were well educated but I’d argue only one of them was enlightened.

    Back in those days I thought I knew it all. I hated courses like communications because I felt they were based on drivel and idle speculation. I tended to courses emphasizing mathematics and reason. I believed that there was always one right answer. It wasn’t until after I graduated that I started truly learning. I read philosophers from Nietzsche, Kant and Bacon to Plato, Descartes and Voltaire. I can’t remember exactly when I changed but the change was profound. I realized the sheer scope of things we really don’t know and that even mathematics is incomplete. I found immense wisdom in some of the least educated individuals I have ever known.

    Dr. Mead I’ve enjoyed reading your posts and on a certain level I agree with you. I agree that the vast majority of human beings have no wisdom and are not enlightened. Also, it is a statistical fact that most people do not have a post-secondary education let alone Bachelors. It is also my opinion that a university education aids in wisdom and enlightenment.

    My point of contention, and the reason I asked for further clarification, is that there are enlightened individuals within all three groups and it sounded somewhat as if the first group, poorly-educated working people, were who you’re referring to when you said, “Unfortunately the evil and greedy interests and their sly minions are good at befuddling and confusing the dumbass masses…”. I would contend that just as there are enlightened individuals in all three of your groups there are also, “the dumbass masses”, in all three. Further, I would contend that a vast majority of the, “dumbass masses”, are similar to myself and would love to further their education but do not have the means or the wherewithal to do so.

    “Anyone who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eyes are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind’s eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye; and he who remembers this when he sees any one whose vision is perplexed and weak, will not be too ready to laugh; he will first ask whether that soul of man has come out of the brighter light, and is unable to see because unaccustomed to the dark, or having turned from darkness to the day is dazzled by excess of light.” (Plato)

  • Rellag

    Dr Mead

    In light of the Stack incident in Austin, and the ongoing societal response, I reiterate that you are onto something very important here.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2015 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service