mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn
Biofuel Boondoggle
America’s Ethanol Industry Shows Why it Needs Subsidies

There’s a growing glut of ethanol here in the United States, and that’s proving to be very bad news for the various producers who have taken advantage of the 2007 law that mandated refiners blend increasing amounts of the fuel additive into gasoline supplies. But lately the EPA has relaxed those quotas, and as a result the market demand for ethanol—which was being driven entirely by government intervention—has fallen well below supply. Bloomberg reports:

Ethanol producers expanded from 81 plants and 3.9 billion gallons of annual capacity in 2005 to 214 distilleries today that can produce 15.7 billion gallons, industry data show. When the government cut its minimum-use mandate to 14.5 billion gallons a year from 15 billion, that left 1.2 billion gallons of surplus capacity. […]

Prospects are so bad, even Archer-Daniels-Midland Co., the biggest ethanol producer, says its looking to scale back operations. Green Plains Inc., Valero Energy Corp., Pacific Ethanol Inc. and Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy LLC also are slowing output, according to company regulatory filings. Abengoa SA, the Spain-based renewable-energy company trying to avoid bankruptcy, said it idled plants in Portales, New Mexico, and Colwich, Kansas, because of lousy profit margins.

We heard about the struggles of Archer Daniels Midland (ADM)—the country’s biggest producer of ethanol—back in February when the company admitted it would be reviewing three of its corn distilling plants for “strategic options” potentially with an eye to sell those assets.

This is what happens when an industry is entirely reliant on government support for its survival. And lest you think the EPA is playing the villain here, the agency had a very real reason to walk back those mandates: refiners can’t realistically blend more than 10 percent ethanol by volume into fuel for fear of ruining older car engines (a limit colloquially called the “blend wall”). That puts a fairly hard cap on things, and the fact that newer cars are being made with higher fuel economy isn’t helping ethanol producers’ cause.

That’s not the only problem with biofuel mandates, of course. They raise global food prices, starving the world’s poor, they cost drivers billions of dollars at the pump every year, and they’re actually bad for the environment. What a mess.

Features Icon
Features
show comments
  • Kevin

    I was glad to see Cruz stand up against the in Iowa. Maybe his success the will prompt more politicians to lineup against this boondoggle.

  • Andrew Allison

    If we had a Congress with a shred of integrity, the enormously costly (to the environment, the hungry, and the taxpayer) ethanol mandate would be long gone, not scaled back!

  • LastNameFirstNameLast✓ᴬᶰᵍʳʸ

    Age it in oak and sherry barrels.

    • Andrew Allison

      Vodka (ethanol diluted 2:3 with water) doesn’t need aging [grin] We should dilute and bottle the surplus under the “Boondoggle” brand and sell it to Russia. Factoid from the experts there: after you think you’ve emptied a bottle of vodka, there are 17 drops left (check it out).

  • John Galt

    Thank you Senator Cruz for standing up to the Ethanol Mandate.

  • M Snow

    I’m not a fan of the EPA, but it’s nice to hear that they, for once, bowed to reality in the form of the “blend wall.”

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2016 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service