mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn
Hail Shale
Fracking Is Making America Greener

Coal is on the wane in the United States. In 2006, the sooty rock made up nearly a quarter of America’s energy mix. Yet, through the first six months of last year, it met just 16 percent of our energy needs. 2015 was, as the EIA reports, a decidedly bad year for Old King Coal:

Since reaching a high point in 2008, coal production in the United States has continued to decline. U.S. coal production in 2015 is expected to be about 900 million short tons (MMst), 10% lower than in 2014 and the lowest level since 1986. Regionally, production from the Appalachian Basin has fallen the most. Low natural gas prices, lower international coal demand, and environmental regulations have contributed to declining U.S. coal production. […]

In the United States, almost all coal is used to generate electricity. Recently, coal’s share of electricity generation has fallen as its market share of natural gas and renewables increased. . . In April 2015, natural gas-fired electricity generation surpassed that of coal-fired generation on a monthly basis for the first time in history, and it did so again in each of the months from July through at least October, the latest monthly data available.

It’s no big secret what’s behind coal’s decline, either. Hydraulic fracturing and horizontal well drilling have transformed the American energy landscape in the space of a decade, unlocking huge new reserves of natural gas and oil that were trapped in shale formations and thought to be inaccessible. Fracking has therefore unleashed a flood of new supplies of hydrocarbons on the U.S. market, and that’s brought natural gas down to bargain basement prices.

As the EIA notes, we mostly use coal to generate electricity, but natural gas-fired power plants can accomplish that same task, which is why plunging natural gas prices are putting the squeeze on coal producers. For parts of the country that rely on the coal industry, this is a bitter pill to swallow, but for America’s environmentalists, this ought to be seen as something of a game changer. Coal is just about the dirtiest fossil fuel around, and burning it not only releases copious amounts of greenhouse gases, but also emits harmful air pollutants into the local environment. Natural gas burns much cleaner, emitting roughly half of those GHGs, and it’s growing momentum in this battle against coal can only be seen as good green news.

But the modern environmental movement is loathe to give any sort of credit to the shale boom, preferring instead to stick to its doom-and-gloom prognostications and moralist chiding. That’s a shame, because America isn’t getting the credit it deserves for greening its economy without donning the eco-hairshirt: No other developed country is making more progress in moving away from coal than we are. We’ve said it before but it bears repeating (even if it does fall on deaf ears amongst environmentalists): Shale gas is fracking green.

Features Icon
Features
show comments
  • rheddles

    What killed coal wads not NG, it was Obama administration.

  • markterribile

    As dirty as coal is, it’s not all equally dirty. The lignite that China and Germany burn is a lot dirtier than the anthracite and bituminous that North America could provide. China will have to be desperate before they buy energy from the USA, though, and I can’t imagine them that desperate. But watch and see if they buy any coal mines.

  • Jacksonian_Libertarian

    “But the modern environmental movement is loathe to give any sort of credit to the shale boom, preferring instead to stick to its doom-and-gloom prognostications and moralist chiding.”

    It’s because it really isn’t what they want. Without the urgency of the “Doomsday” scenarios like “the animals are going to go extinct”, “the hole in the Ozone layer will kill us all”, “Global Warming will (warm things up?) cause something really bad to happen”, the environmentalists find their incomes crushed. As donations dry up, grants disappear, political boondoggles which fund green energy to the tune of Billions of Taxpayers dollars become political poison, regulations that cost everyone huge amounts of money become unjustifiable, carbon trading schemes start looking like extortion rackets.
    If it was really what they wanted they would be all over Nuclear power as the savior of Mankind, since it doesn’t produce any Carbon Dioxide. They would be pushing the development of Shale as it creates much less Carbon Dioxide. But since they aren’t for these energy sources, it means they don’t really care about “Global Warming”, and what they really want is just to “hurt Mankind”.
    They see Mankind and his works, as a desecration of their Goddess Gaia. But Gaia sees Mankind as her finest creation, and loves the Humanocentric Ecology that has evolved to include thousands if not tens of thousands of species.

  • Terenc Blakely

    “That’s a shame, because America isn’t getting the credit it deserves for greening its economy without donning the eco-hairshirt”

    You misunderstand, the left want prols wearing eco-hairshirts. One of the many things the left despise is an independent, content, motivated citizenry.

  • jim

    The greenies don’t want cleaner electricity, they want you proles taking the bus to work. And if the $15 a gallon tax on gas to make that happen provides a lot of money to fund jobs for environmental “studies” majors, well a win-win, right?!

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2016 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service