mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn
The Intermittency Issue
US Wind Energy Stuck in the Doldrums

The U.S. installed nearly 10 percent more wind production capacity over the last year, so why is output down 6 percent so far this year? As the FT reports, the answer may be as simple as, “it hasn’t been as windy.” 2015 has been one of the least windy years in around 40 years, according to the paper.

“We never anticipated a drop-off in the wind resource as we have witnessed over the past six months,” David Crane, chief executive of power producer NRG Energy, told analysts…

And El Niño is expected to keep wind speeds slow in the opening months of 2016, which means that this trend will persist into next year. Slightly slower wind speeds are no small problem, either. The Energy Information Administration explains that “[b]ecause the output from a turbine varies nonlinearly with wind speed, small decreases in wind speeds can result in much larger changes in output.” In other words, even a small dip in velocity can have outsized consequences for the renewable source.

This exemplifies one of the biggest challenges renewables face: intermittency. Solar panels will obviously struggle to produce electricity on cloudier days, and wind turbines require a minimum air speed before it even makes sense to turn them on. But consumers aren’t going to stop relying on electricity when the wind dies down or the day becomes cloudy, and, lacking any cost-effective storage options for renewables, we’re once again left with the undeniable fact that fossil fuels are a necessary cornerstone of modern society. Greens will be loathe to admit it, but solar and wind energy require a more consistent baseload partner.

Features Icon
Features
show comments
  • alanstorm

    Or we could follow the European’s lead, as the left would have us do on so many subjects, and generate most of our electricity with nuclear power – like France.

    Funny how the left never brings that up.

  • Boritz

    “…the undeniable fact that fossil fuels are a necessary cornerstone of modern society.”

    Greens don’t deny this at all. They deny the desirability of modern society and wish to pry this cornerstone from it’s place.

  • rheddles

    Greens will be loathe to admit it, but solar and wind energy require a more consistent baseload partner.

    More like solar only makes sense if the application is far from powerlines and wind makes sense only if you’re pumping water. Otherwise you have to build conventional baseload capacity to cover for intermittancy or have brownouts. If you build the baseload, why do you need the solar or wind?

    What this really demonstrates is the necessity for developing safer modular nuclear reactors.

  • Rick Johnson

    Gosh. This is breaking news. No wind, no sun, no power. Who knew.
    It’s amost like the Greens have been telling us great big fat fibes abd the mainstream media is happy to report their fibs as facts. Surely not.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2016 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service