mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn
Europe's Immigration Crisis
Record High Weekend for Refugees, Rescues in Med

The first weekend of Europe’s new migrant rescue plan saw a near-record number of rescues in the Mediterranean Sea—but also a surge in attempted crossings, a development which is sure to fuel continued debate over the EU’s evolving response to the immigration crisis. The Financial Times reports:

Italian coastguard and navy ships led the rescue of more than 6,550 migrants in the Mediterranean Sea at the weekend, in a sign that the surge of refugees fleeing via Libya for a better life on European shores has accelerated.

On Saturday, Italian coastguard officials say 3,790 people were saved from 17 separate boats in distress, marking one of the largest single-day tallies of rescued refugees. An additional 2,861 were estimated to have been rescued on Sunday, officials said.

Events such as these will likely confirm the fears of those who suspect that Mediterranean rescue efforts will likely increase, rather than ameliorate, the migrant problem by providing a significant ‘pull’ factor: come this way, and a Western navy or charity will rescue you and take you to dry land. (And recall that under European law, it’s very difficult to repatriate someone claiming to be a refugee.)

There are other factors at work, to be sure: the warmer weather for one is supposed to have made making the voyage far more palatable (which bodes ill for the months ahead). And the conditions in Somalia and Libya are so miserable that it’s hard to imagine what risks one wouldn’t take to get out.

Thousands of lives were saved, and any way you cut it, that is an improvement over the old policy (which really was no policy at all). But given the complexity of the problem—the complex incentives for the migrants, the difficulty many European societies have with assimilating newcomers both culturally and economically—the Europeans are far from out of the woods on this issue.


Features Icon
show comments
  • mdmusterstone

    “…sure to fuel continued
    debate…” There is a
    “debate” when facts are not known or are in doubt, neither is the
    case here.

    The facts are that even if the EU
    economy was charging full ahead there is a limit to how many low skilled refugees
    they can admit–more, people who have not assimilated well. But the economy is not and has not for a
    while been healthy.

    The fact is that the EU is choosing
    to be a hostage. An existential choice; any
    radical group could do decisive harm to the integrity of the Western
    Civilization by facilitating a flood of hundreds of thousands of people a
    month. Forced, the EU would then have to
    stop the flow and there would be a real loss of life. Presently the EU policies are apparently based
    on solving the problem with some kind of magic or ignoring it but that begs the
    question as to when in the last hundred years or so Europe has done anything
    but ignore problems until said problems slapped them in the face?

    If someone arrived at my door
    today telling they had a problem and that I had to solve it by the end of the
    day or the end of any day I would be right in saying that in fact I am not
    responsible for the resolution of that problem.
    Further, if I choose to help I am not, by any ethical standard, required
    to destroy my living space or myself in the pursuit of that help.

    Ideals seem to be the sticking
    point here. The fact is that ideals that
    destroy the idealist are not ideal.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2016 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service