mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn
The Francis Era
How Long Until the Media Turns Against Pope Francis?

The media may have started to catch onto the fact that the Pope is Catholic. Yesterday Salon ran a long screed against pro-Francis media narratives, arguing that underneath the symbolism and gestures of solidarity, the Pope is just as much a “sexist homophobe” as his predecessor. Here’s just a taste:

On January 17, 2014, Politico pointed out that in an interview given by the pope in August 2013, and published in September of that year, “Pope Francis said the church did not have to talk about gay marriage and abortion all the time.” And yet, “the very next day [after the interview was published] Francis condemned abortion as ‘unjust.’” Furthermore, after the interview was given, a week before its publication, the pope excommunicated a priest from Melbourne, Australia, Greg Reynolds, for advocating for female clergy and gay marriage.  Pope Francis’s seemingly understanding words about gay marriage and abortion were sandwiched in between two events that completely undermined that message.

We’ve long noted that Francis fans in the media were likely to turn against him once they realized that he was never going to change the Catholic Church’s stance on issues related to marriage, sexuality, and the family. It was only a matter of time before his “Good Friday” moment, when the adulation of the chattering classes turned to bitter hostility. Salon is not the most important media outlet around, obviously, and more influential places like NYT still seem happy to run pieces applauding Francis for things like personnel changes at the Vatican.

But Salon is worth watching for indications of where narratives are going. This piece, then, is one of the first signs that the moment might be approaching when the goodwill he has so far won disappears. If anything, the coming antagonism towards this Pope may be even worse than that faced by the last: Benedict was pegged as a “reactionary” from the start, but many in the media expected great progressive acts from Francis, and has interpreted many of his words and actions as encouragement for their causes. Their disappointment is likely to be bitter indeed.

Features Icon
show comments
  • FriendlyGoat

    We hardly need “Salon” to tell us whether Pope Francis is good or not. Many people are delighted that he is asking the world to 1) See Jesus, and 2) Act on a concern for the poor. THAT IS ENOUGH. Full stop.

    He is quite right that the Church need not be talking about gay marriage and abortion all the time. There are other issues and this Pope is neither a bum nor a buffoon, regardless of his media critics, and regardless of the legacy of Catholic Church dogma..

    Full disclosure: I am not a Catholic.

  • gabrielsyme

    More evidence that social liberals have extremely low reading comprehension.

    • johngbarker

      Especially true if reading is reasoning.

  • Corlyss

    Anyone who looks to mainstream reporters for praise of his or anyone else’s religion is looking for love in all the wrong places. Media likes religion as long as it preaches liberation theology, takes up arms against tyrants, and gets itself martyred. Once that kind of battle is won, media has no use for religion and doesn’t care who knows it.

  • S.C. Schwarz

    Among western liberals, the religious are the only group that it is acceptable to discriminate against.

  • ljgude

    Well….as they say in Joisey: “Iz da Pope Catlik?” Inevitable, I suppose, that the media will discover that Francis is not Che Guevara after all. Nice bit of technical analysis watching Salon as a leading indicator of who may fall out of favor next.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2016 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service