mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn
Sunni Powers Mobilize to Confront Iran-Hezbollah Axis in Syria


The Sunni-Shiite civil war is revving up to dangerous speeds. “Saudi Arabia expressly will not allow Iran to win in Syria,” wrote Jamal Khashoggi earlier this week at Al-Arabiya (h/t Michael Weiss over at NOW). Khashoggi, a Saudi journalist who is considered close to Prince Turki al-Faisal, the former Director General of Saudi intelligence, is pretty well plugged in. “The kingdom’s security is at stake.”

This may not be throwaway rhetoric. It dovetails with other remarks by leaders around the region that suggest that victories in Syria by the Iran-Hezbollah-Assad axis have made a deep impression on the entire Sunni Arab world. The Sunnis, it seems, are preparing to push back, hard.

As we noted earlier this week, Egypt severed ties with Damascus. In addition, at a conference of Sunni clerics in Cairo last week, a Brotherhood official urged “jihad with mind, money, weapons—all forms of jihad.” King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia cut short his summer vacation to return home and meet with his national security team. And King Abdullah of Jordan is exercised too: “If the world does not mobilize or help us in the issue [of Syria] as it should, or if this matter forms a danger to our country, we are able at any moment to take measures that will protect our land and the interests of our people,” he said on Monday.

“Let the objective be to bring down Assad fast,” Khashoggi writes. “The objective is bound to draw together multiple forces ranging from the Anbar tribes to Hamas to Egypt’s Brothers to Tunisia to the Gulf Countries. That would entice Turkey to partake in the alliance.”

This, then, is the state of play in the Middle East today. To intervene in Syria or not was never going to be an easy call, but if administration officials thought the choice would get easier with time, they were wrong. As Weiss concludes: “The United States has just earned a court-side seat to exactly the kind of transnational Sunni-Shiite confrontation it wished to avoid.”

[Image of combatants in Syria courtesy of Shutterstock]

Features Icon
show comments
  • Lyle7

    I don’t see how this part of the world can’t move on from itself without some kind of great destabilization.

    The American Civil War was ugly and nasty too. Neither side, Sunni or Shia is right though.

    Although the Shia may have more secularists in their midst or around them (the large secular groups in both Iran and Lebanon, and in the diaspora).

  • Anstaf

    OMG! Next thing you know, they might even like, you know, try overtly cooperating with the Zionist entity! LOL.

    (Yes, that was tongue-in-cheek.)

    • foobarista

      If we stick with the 30 Years War analogy, I could see how Israel may end up (ironically) taking the role of the Ottoman Turks in that one.

  • jeburke

    As I posted once before, I’m for volunteering to hold their coats while they take out Assad. The principal Sunni powers in the region have powerful combined air forces that boast a total of 1500 attack aircraft, including hundreds of advanced F-16s and F-15s, so they should be able to make quick work of imposing a no-fly zone. Operating through Jordan and Turkey, the Sunni states should be able to mount a nifty ground invasion, powered by Turkish, Egyptian and Jordanian tanks.

  • ljgude

    Yes, the possibilities for a general conflagration seem considerably enhanced. What has happened to the brave new democrats of Tahrir square? Gone, like the boys of summer. And the moderate Muslim Brothers? Vanished like the snows of yesteryear.

  • bpuharic

    There’s still no ‘there’ there. Sunni/Shia civil conflicts are perpetual and our lack of intervention will have no effect. What’s in it for us to intervene? Do you REALLY think we’re going to produce a democratic moderate Muslim state? If it’s failed in Turkey there’s no reason to think it’ll work in Syria.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2016 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service