From the September - October 2006 issue: Between Relativism and Fundamentalism

Contemporary culture (and by no means only in America) appears to be in the grip of two seemingly contradictory forces. One pushes the culture toward relativism, the view that there are no absolutes whatever, that moral or philosophical truth is inaccessible if not illusory. The other pushes toward a militant and uncompromising affirmation of this or that (alleged) absolute truth. There are idiomatic formulas for both relativism and what is commonly called fundamentalism: “Let us agree to disagree” as against “You just don’t get it.”

Beware of concluding too quickly that both can be legitimate components of civil discourse: Imagine the first being the response to an interlocutor who favors pedophile rape, the second uttered by someone who favors the mass murder of infidels. Rather, both formulas make civil discourse impossible, because both (albeit for opposite reasons) preclude a common and reasoned quest for moral or philosophical agreement. Relativism is bad for civility because it precludes the moral condemnation of virtually anything at all. Fundamentalism is bad for civility because it produces irresolvable conflict with those who do not share its beliefs. And both are bad for any hope of arriving at valid normative conclusions by means of rational discourse, relativism because there is no will to such a discourse, and fundamentalism because there is no way to it.

For reasons that may not be immediately obvious, relativism and fundamentalism as cultural forces are closely interlinked. This is not only because one can morph and, more often than may be appreciated, does morph into the other: In every relativist there is a fundamentalist about to be born, and in every fundamentalist there is a relativist waiting to be liberated. More basically, it is because both relativism and fundamentalism are products of the same process of modernization; indeed, both are intrinsically modern phenomena of going to extremes. What follows is an attempt, by means of a sociological analysis, to show how the two phenomena are related.

...
Want to read more?

The full text of the article is for subscribers only. To continue reading it, please log in below:

Login:
Password:
 
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today for only $19!
Peter L. Berger is director of the Institute on Culture, Religion and World Affairs (CURA) at Boston University and author, most recently, of Questions of Faith (Blackwell, 2004). See also: AI Symposium: The Sources of American Conduct by Peter Berger Moral Certainty, Theological Doubt by Peter Berger Born-Again Modernity by Peter Berger
Share this Article: