where to buy accutane online

zovirax buy online

buy ventolin online

don't show this ad again
From the January/February 2012 issue: The Death of Money How America's cheap money addiction is inflating the next bubble and undermining faith in government.

Time magazine starred Alan Greenspan on its cover in 1998 for cutting interest rates, naming him one as of three people comprising a “Committee to Save the World.” Eleven years later, the same magazine indicted him as one of three people most culpable for the great economic collapse of 2008–09. Then, in 2009, Time named Greenspan’s successor, Ben Bernanke, as “Man of the Year” for cutting interest rates as part of “an effort to save the world economy.” Guess what comes next in this sequence of praise and blame, relief and recrimination. You have to work hard not to see it on the horizon, and the reason is clear: When money is too cheap for too long, it inevitably creates a problem.

In those bygone days known as the 20th century, the problem cheap money created was consumer price inflation. In the past 25 years or so, it isn’t consumer prices but asset prices that have run away. Cheap money gushed into real estate in the 1980s, into tech stocks in the late 1990s and into housing in the early 2000s; now it is gushing into food and commodity prices. When interest rates are low and money flows freely, all seems good and getting better. But each inrush of cheap money merely sets up high asset prices for the collapse to come. And when collapse comes, it’s nearly always bigger than the one before. And to recover from that collapse, the Federal Reserve makes money cheaper still, for even longer than it did the time before.

It has to escalate the dosage because, like that next hit of heroin, each gush of cheap money is less effective in restoring growth to the economy than the one before. When real estate prices turned down in 1989, contributing to the mild recession that started the next year, the Fed cut interest rates to 3 percent and kept them there for a year and a half. When the stock market bubble of 2000 burst and led to the “tech wreck” recession of 2001, the Fed cut interest rates to 1 percent and held them there for a year. When the housing bubble of 2007 burst and led to the Great Recession of 2009–10, the Fed cut interest rates to zero and has held them there for almost three years so far, with the promise of another two years to come.

This money is not just cheap. Indeed, even calling it free would understate just how cheap it is. If you consider that U.S. inflation is expected to be about...

Want to read more?
The full text of the article is for subscribers only. To continue reading it, please log in below:
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today for only $19!
This article appeared in:
Table of Contents
Please log in to unlock printing and access to PDFs.

Peter Hartcher is the author of Bubble Man: Alan Greenspan and the Missing Seven Trillion Dollars (2006), which predicted the collapse of the U.S. housing market and the recession that followed. He is the political editor of the Sydney Morning Herald.

Walter Russell Mead
Could Sufi Islam Make A Comeback? Sufi Islam—more mystical, more concerned with God’s love than God’s law, and much more tolerant toward other faiths and other varieties of Islam—has been on ... Swiss System Offers Hints About US Under Obamacare Readers trying to understand how Obamacare will transform our health care system should look to Switzerland. Bloomberg profiles the Swiss health care system, which is perhaps ... Russia Outs CIA Moscow Station Chief, Administration Continues To Appease Russia continues to show respect and appreciation for the White House, this time by breaking protocol and outing the CIA’s Moscow station chief. The Guardian ... Retirement Roundup: All Roads Lead Abroad Baby Boomers have lost, on average, 117 thousand dollars in retirement savings to unexpected “retirement derailers,” according to a recent Ameriprise Financial survey. CNN money reports: Nearly ...