Donald Trump’s conversation with Taiwan’s president was the call heard round the world, signaling an end to the Obama era of foreign policy and a willingness to re-negotiate the fundamentals of the U.S.-China relationship, including the One China policy. Now, Trump’s disruptive break with the status quo is encouraging the hopes of another disputed territory: Tibet. Reuters:
The head of the Tibetan government-in-exile said on Friday he was encouraged by U.S. President-elect Donald Trump’s tough stand on China and urged him to ditch backdoor diplomacy on furthering the Tibetan cause and be more confrontational.
The United States and its European allies have sought to engage China over allegations of repression since Washington reached out to Beijing back in the 1970s, effectively driving the Tibetan issue out of public forums, Lobsang Sangay said.
But that approach had not worked and human rights abuses had only worsened, the Harvard-educated legal scholar told Reuters in an interview. […]
“It’s time for an open discourse where we press the Chinese government. We are not saying put sanctions, but that we be forthright, be frank on what’s going on in Tibet and in China in general and to raise the issue.
“And publicly share what’s going on what has happened, because we have to make the Chinese government accountable,” he said in remarks ahead of the release of a report on what activists see as the erosion of Tibetans’ ethnic and religious identity and the degradation of their environment.
Sangay’s exhortation reveals the extent to which Trump’s messaging can have knock-on effects that he may not have anticipated. The president-elect recently suggested that he viewed the Taiwan issue as a bargaining chip to extract a better trade deal with China. But in his eagerness to pursue bilateral negotiations with China, Trump may struggle to keep such issues contained; already, his words have unnerved some in Taipei and now seem to be giving ideas to Tibet’s government-in-exile.
It is not clear how much Sangay really expects of Trump, nor is it evident that Trump particularly cares about Tibet’s human rights situation. The president-elect has notably downgraded concerns about human rights and democracy in favor of a more transactional foreign policy. Still, Tibetan activists like Sangay may see in Trump the chance to increase the public exposure of their cause, and Trump could use Tibet as another way to needle Beijing. Expect for more marginal players to jockey for influence as they seek to ride Trump’s coattails and push for a more confrontational posture against China.