mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn
Under Pressure
Finland Faces Kremlin Media Assault

Russian information warfare is old news to Ukraine and the Baltics, but increasingly it is being deployed against Finland as well. Reuters reports on the view from Helsinki, where Finnish authorities have noted an uptick in Russian propaganda:

Sitting in his office in the government palace – built for Russia’s Grand Duchy of Finland – Markku Mantila leads a network of officials who monitor attempts to influence the country.

He says Finland is facing intensifying media attacks led by Kremlin. 

“We believe this aggressive influencing from Russia aims at creating distrust between leaders and citizens, and to have us make decisions harmful to ourselves,” he said. “It also aims to make citizens suspicious about the European Union, and to warn Finland over not joining NATO.” […]

Russian propaganda attacks on Finland have not occurred in a vacuum. Since 2014, Moscow has indulged in a series of escalatory actions that have unnerved its northern neighbor. In 2015, Finland fired warning shots at a Russian submarine in its waters. Last month, Russia deployed S-400 anti-aircraft missiles to the Finnish border, and this month Russian airplanes once again violated Finnish airspace.

More insidiously, Finland has experienced unpredictable influxes of Syrian migrants crossing the border from Russia. Such movements could only have been possible with the cooperation of the Russian FSB, and Finnish leaders suspect that the refugee flows are a signal from Moscow about its ability to destabilize the country.

From Finland’s perspective, Russia’s actions are provocative and irresponsible, as Finland is militarily neutral and has sought to avoid confrontation with Russia. Moscow sees things differently. Finland has long entertained a discussion about possibly joining NATO: a highly unlikely scenario that nonetheless has the Russians on edge. At a meeting in July, Putin directly warned Finland that joining NATO would cause Russia to send troops to the Finnish border.

Even if Finnish membership in NATO is unlikely, Moscow aims to pressure Finland and punish the country for its European proclivities. Although Finland formally maintains a policy of military neutrality, it has taken several clear steps westward. In August, Finnish Defense Minister Jussi Niinsto announced an imminent cooperation agreement with the United States on joint military training and information sharing. This followed a similar deal with the UK that was signed in July, a Swedish-U.S. defense agreement in June, and both Finland and Sweden’s ongoing participation in NATO exercises around the Baltics.

For Moscow, those steps are more than enough to justify breaking out the hybrid warfare playbook. Time will tell if Moscow pushes too far—and if Finland dares to push back.

Features Icon
show comments
  • Jim__L

    The answer?

    Robust Finnish nationalism. Nothing else will help.

    Nationalism is a good thing, guys.

    • Kev

      Too much nationalism, and the country might leave the EU, which what Russians want 😉

      • Jim__L

        Because Russians are afraid of the EU?


  • Kev

    Reuters article itself is a good example of anti-Russian propaganda. Influencing public opinion in a foreign country – isn’t this what US government does all the time everywhere? Voice of America has a Russian language service – is this a form of American “hybrid warfare”?

    Some Finnish politicians clearly want to take their country into NATO, but the costs of this decision are being hidden from the public. It’s up to Russian media to try and fill this gap.

    • JR

      Can i ask you a somewhat unrelated question? Why do paid Russian trolls insist on using names like “Kev”? Not that I’m judging you in any way. A man’s gotta eat.

      • Kev

        I’m not familiar with any “paid Russian trolls”, so perhaps you should ask them directly?

        Seriously though, it’s pretty sad if you really believe that people are paid to have an opinion. What does it say about you? Are you being paid to write this garbage?

        • JR

          Why so hostile? I thought I was as polite as can be. Everyone is free to have an opinion. I just noticed that your opinion is identical to what you might find on RT. Nothing wrong with that, except that it is well known in the West that Russia has thousands employed to comment on websites pushing a pro-Russian line. I therefore put two and two together and figured it out. You never comment on anything else. We both know for a fact that I’m not the first person on this site to call you out on being an RT bot. Like I said previously, I’m not here to judge. A man’s got to eat AND drink, if you know what I mean. Just why the use of American names? There are plenty of Russian trolls who proudly use their Slavic names. Like, why not you?

    • CaliforniaStark

      Am curious, what is the costs of the decision to enter NATO that are being hidden from the public? Inquiring Finns would like to know.

      A Finnish leader once stated that the Russians were “more like brothers to the Finns than friends; your able to pick your friends.”

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2016 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service