mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn
Uber Alles
Laissez-Faire Lefties

The possibly fatal contradictions of the urban anti-Uber crusade have been clear for some time: The politicians most invested in the fight against the gig economy (Bill DeBlasio and company) are also heavily dependent for votes upon its most dedicated consumers—young, educated liberals.

But a new Pew report highlights the depth of the challenges true-blue politicians are likely to face in the long run if they try to bring the sharing economy to heel in the name of protecting established business interests. The report confirms that young people and people under 45 make up the lion’s share of Uber-users, and that they are strongly opposed to new regulations that could shut the company out of the market:

This general anti-regulatory attitude is particularly notable given the overall political leanings of ride-hailing users as a group: As a whole, ride-hailing users are twice as likely to identify as Democrats as Republicans (65% identify with or lean toward the Democratic Party, while 33% identify as or lean Republican). Ride-hailing users who identify with or lean toward the Democratic Party believe (by a 54% to 30% margin) that these services should not have to follow the same regulations as incumbent providers.

The same sentiment applies to home-sharing services like AirBnB:

As might be expected, users who are ideologically conservative, along with those who identify with or lean toward the Republican Party, feel overwhelmingly that people renting out their homes on these services should not have to pay any sort of taxes in order to do so. But this view is also held – albeit to a lesser degree – by users of these services who are to the left of the political spectrum. Users who are Democrats or lean Democratic believe (by a 51% to 38% margin) that homeowners who use these services should not have to pay taxes as a condition of doing so, and liberal users take an anti-tax stance by a similar margin (54% to 34%).

Free-marketers shouldn’t necessarily take these results as evidence that their limited government and anti-cronyism ideas are winning out overall. More likely, these results reflect the fact that the liberal ideology of the urban professional class has always been selective: Attractive as a form of virtue signaling, but easily abandoned when the bills start coming due. Nonetheless, those of us who believe the sharing economy will play an important role in the 21st century should be heartened by the report, which suggests that the reactionary political coalition looking to sink the gig economy may not be around for much longer.

Features Icon
Features
show comments
  • Andrew Allison

    The question you should be asking is whether those under 45 have the sense to realize who’s responsible and make their feeling known.

    • f1b0nacc1

      I rather doubt that they have the sense, but those of us on the Right wouldn’t go far wrong by pounding that information home at every conceivable opportunity. Don’t let them ignore it, and don’t let them be ignorant of it….

  • Boritz

    “are strongly opposed to new taxes and regulations.”

    This supposition is merely the result of an improperly constructed survey. Try this:
    Is it fair for Republicans to harm [your favorite victim group/protected class] by passing tax cuts for the rich and gutting regulations that protect the environment? That should produce the correct result long enough to get through an election or referendum.

  • FriendlyGoat

    It’s not whether young urbanites wish to keep Uber and AirBnB. Of course they do. It’s whether anyone is hiring them to do anything other than drive for Uber or rent out a room in their apartments. So, as it says above, “Free-marketers shouldn’t necessarily take these results as evidence that their limited government and anti-cronyism ideas are winning out overall.”

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2016 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service