mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn
The European Immigration Crisis
200 Somalis Drown Off Egypt

Several hundred migrants and refugees are reported to have drowned after their vessel capsized in the Mediterranean. Reuters reports:

Somalia’s government said on Monday about 200 or more Somalis may have drowned in the Mediterranean Sea while trying to cross illegally to Europe, many of them teenagers, when the boat they were on capsized after leaving the Egyptian shore.

Italian President Sergio Mattarella had said earlier on Monday that several hundred people appeared to have died in a new tragedy in the Mediterranean, after unconfirmed reports spoke of up to 400 victims of capsizing near Egypt’s coast.[..]

“We have no fixed number but it is between 200 and 300 Somalis,” Somali Information Minister Mohamed Abdi Hayir told Reuters by telephone when asked about possible Somali deaths in the latest incident.[..]

“There is no clear number since they are not traveling legally,” the minister said, adding that he understood the boat might have been carrying about 500 people, of which 200 to 300 were Somalis “and most of them had died”.

Yet again, we see the outrageous price of Europe’s moral hypocrisy on the refugee-migrant problem. The Continent wants to have the feel-good frisson that comes with a “refugees welcome” policy (and avoid the ickiness that comes with enforcing the law against desperate people whose only real crime is wanting a better life for themselves and their families). At the same time, the EU does not have the courage of its convictions: it will not simply allow people to fly (more cheaply and much more safely) en masse to Europe.

The recent EU-Turkey deal changed this calculus with regard to Greece, but when it comes to Italy, the old system prevails: Italy and the EU mount underfunded, understaffed patrols in the Mediterranean that bring anyone they find to Europe (rather than dropping them back at point of origin), where the newcomers are allowed to apply for asylum, move north, and/or blend into the general population. This mawkish half-humanitarianism encourages, rather than deters, dangerous, deadly crossings such as this. This series of policies in practice boils down to “if you can survive, then you can stay.”

And many do not survive. This is not moral, and it is not humanitarian. The wages of hypocrisy continue to be paid in death.

Features Icon
Features
show comments
  • Kevin

    What is the responsibility of people who have collectively ruined their native country and then wish to go abroad to ruin another one?

    The individual refugee may be pitiable, but collectively they are also responsible for the political culture and through that the economic system of the lands they are fleeing.

    Despised and powerless minorities who had no hope of ever effecting political change in their native lands are far less culpable for the wreckage they flee, but those who have actively participated in the creation and maintenance of dysfunctional political cultures over generations are not.

    • Ellen

      Right. The Muslims who support sectarian hatred in their own lands, leading to full-blown civil war and mass atrocities, have no moral claim on anyone’s conscious to provide them with refuge. Christian and other minorities are a different story. Somalia is 100% Muslim, but of different tribes. The Syrians fleeing are mostly Sunnis who are fleeing because they couldn’t murder enough Alawites and Shiites to force them to flee instead. That’s about the shape of it.

    • Jacksonian_Libertarian

      Excellent points, I see things more in the light of a “National Inheritance” that immigrants are trying to steal, degrade, dilute, and destroy, at the expense of the rightful heirs.

  • RedWell

    “If you can survive, then you can stay” is exactly the US policy toward Cubans.

  • Jim__L

    “The Continent wants to have the feel-good frisson that comes
    with a “refugees welcome” policy (and avoid the ickiness that comes with
    enforcing the law against desperate people whose only real crime is
    wanting a better life for themselves and their families).”

    OK, let’s unpack this a bit. People who commit home invasion robberies are also often “only … wanting a better life for themselves and their families”.

    Breaking the law is not a good way of doing so. Putting pressure on a social system that cannot stand the strain that migration is putting on it, is not a good way of doing so. While you’re in someone else’s country, raping and robbing people in public places is certainly not a good way of doing so.

    The marginalized citizens of these countries are well within their rights to insist that the governments of their respective countries pay greater heed to their needs than the needs of everyone else in the world generally.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2016 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service