mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn
brave new world
State-Sponsored Hackers Have Had Access to US Government for “Years”

A mysterious organization called APT6 has had access to supposedly-protected U.S. government files for years, according to the FBI. Motherboard:

The feds warned that “a group of malicious cyber actors,” whom security experts believe to be the government-sponsored hacking group known as APT6, “have compromised and stolen sensitive information from various government and commercial networks” since at least 2011, according to an FBI alert obtained by Motherboard.

The alert, which is also available online, shows that foreign government hackers are still successfully hacking and stealing data from US government’s servers, their activities going unnoticed for years. This comes months after the US government revealed that a group of hackers, widely believed to be working for the Chinese government, had for more than a year infiltrated the computer systems of the Office of Personnel Management, or OPM. In the process, they stole highly sensitive dataabout severalmillions of government workers and even spies.

In the alert, the FBI lists a long series of websites used as command and control servers to launch phishing attacks “in furtherance of computer network exploitation (CNE) activities [read: hacking] in the United States and abroad since at least 2011.”

It’s not known who the hackers might be, although some experts say Chinese involvement is likely. Last year, we learned that Chinese hackers had hacked the Office of Personnel Management, accessing information on tens of thousands of government employees. The revelation that China had information about government employees compelled the CIA to pull assets from Beijing, among other significant consequences.

That the federal government has yet to get a full grip on even the scope of the problem certainly points to just how tough a problem cybersecurity is. We’re struck by how little attention the vulnerability of U.S. data gets from the White House. Previously, we’ve seen the White House consider addressing the problem with sanctions on Chinese individuals and companies. But that’s not likely to be an effective response in a situation where defense really is the best form of offense. Right now, America’s cyber defenses simply aren’t doing their job. Shoring them up seems like it should be a higher priority.

Features Icon
Features
show comments
  • slovokia

    The current Whitehouse occupant seems more concerned with controlling information flow to the press compared with information flow to the intelligence services of our geopolitical competitors. It makes sense because the press is more of a threat to the acquisition and maintanence of political power (domestically).

    • Beauceron

      “This is the most transparent administration in history”

      — President Barack Obama, 2/2013

      The President said it. Our smitten press repeated it dutifully and fervently.

      Thus, it is true.

  • Matt B

    Hopefully the DoD, CIA and NSA have done an adequate job of protecting their systems, but it’s fair to assume that China and Russia have seen everything outside of those agencies, as well as commercial data.

    • Jim__L

      Not to mention everything on servers kept in basements or bathrooms throughout the country.

      Don’t forget, though, that secrecy is still useful even if some of our enemies know some of our secrets. There is advantage to be gained (not just to us, but to the enemies that know as well) whenever information is successfully withheld from those with malicious intent.

      • Boritz

        “There are no special privilege rules…”

        The fact that no recommendation is forthcoming after this amount of time serves to invalidate this ideal, but I know what you mean.

    • Angel Martin

      “Hopefully the DoD, CIA and NSA have done an adequate job of protecting their systems”

      after the fiascos with “Bradley” Manning, John Deutsch and Edward Snowden, I think we know the answer to that question.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2016 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service