mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn
South China Sea Standoff
U.S. Applies Pressure In South China Sea, But Beijing Digs In

A top U.S. general says that the Air Force will continue to fly missions over the South China Sea, despite Beijing’s warnings. The NYT:

Gen. Lori Robinson, the commander of the Pacific Air Forces, also urged other nations to exercise their freedom to fly and sail in international airspace and waters claimed by China in the South China Sea “or risk losing it throughout the region.”

“We’ve watched the increased military capability on those islands, whether it’s the fighters, whether it’s the missiles or the 10,000-foot runways. We will continue to do as we’ve always done, and that is fly and sail in international airspace in accordance to international rules and norms,” Robinson told reporters in Australia’s capital, Canberra, where she will address the Royal Australian Air Force’s biennial Air Power Conference next week.

Robinson declined to say how the United States would retaliate if a U.S. plane was shot down by the Chinese.

Meanwhile, satellite imagery analyzed last week shows that China has been filling in land between two islands in the Paracels. And the Chinese government’s rhetoric has been clear: Beijing says it won’t budge.

Things are escalating pretty rapidly, as all sides dig in deeper. Who will blink first?

Features Icon
Features
show comments
  • CapitalHawk

    Q: Who will blink first?
    A: Obama.

    • Jim__L

      And can you imagine what a field day they’d have with Hillary the inadequate-or-invisible SoS?

    • Fat_Man

      Most likely. Sigh.

  • Andrew Allison

    “Robinson declined to say how the United States would retaliate if a U.S. plane was shot down by the Chinese.” Blink. If the US is serious it should put the Chinese on notice that doing so would be regarded as an act of war.

  • Blackbeard

    Meanwhile, in other news, the U.S. will be disbanding one of its ten carrier battle groups in 2016. This is necessary because we no longer have enough carriers to keep ten battle groups active. We had 12 carriers in 1998, we have 10 now, and it will be down to 9 soon. This is consistent with Obama’s ongoing plans to reduce overall military spending to levels not seen since before WWII. Does anyone think that either Bernie or Hillary would reverse this trend?

    Great powers rise and great powers fall. In which direction do you think China believes we are going?

  • Fat_Man

    The Chinese wouldn’t dare to mistreat its biggest debtor that way.

  • rheddles

    Lori…Is that short for Lauris Norstadt, a real military name?

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2016 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service