mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn
North Korea Fallout
DPRK Missile Launch Empowers Regional Hawks

The U.N. Security Council condemned North Korea’s Sunday morning missile launch, but it’s not yet clear what concrete actions, if any, the Council will take. CNN:

At an emergency meeting Sunday, members of the U.N. Security Council “strongly condemned” the launch and reaffirmed that “a clear threat to international peace and security continues to exist, especially in the context of the nuclear test.”

Security Council members have previously threatened “further significant measures” if there was another North Korean launch and now will “adopt expeditiously a new Security Council resolution with such measures in response to these dangerous and serious violations,” according to a statement read by Venezuela’s ambassador to the United Nations after the meeting.

China could use its veto to block any Security Council sanctions on the DPRK. Yet that power is more of a burden than a blessing for Beijing, which has to balance its desire to limit both the U.S. military presence in the region and the hawkishness of its neighbors against its commitment to Pyongyang. Indeed, the most important consequence of the launch could be the deployment in South Korea of a missile defense system developed and managed by the United States. A spokeswoman in Beijing said China is “deeply concerned” by reports that Seoul and Washington are planning talks on the THAAD (Terminal High Altitude Area Defense) system.

Sanctions (should they be proposed) and a missile defense system are not the only possible consequences of the missile launch. By scaring everybody and making cooperation with the U.S. and Japan look more attractive, North Korea’s move gives the current South Korean government a big boost in its efforts to handle the fallout over last December’s “comfort women” deal. Pyongyang’s bad behavior (and Beijing’s inability and/or refusal to control it) pushes politics in both South Korea and Japan to the right.

Features Icon
Features
show comments
  • Gene

    I really wish we could dispense with the left/right spectrum in such a case. How do perfectly reasonable security concerns in So. Korea and Japan somehow constitute “rightism”? Are Korean and Japanese leftists not allowed to worry about the insane and reckless leadership in Pyongyang?

    • Jim__L

      It’s not that they lack the right to support defense measures, it’s that they lack the capacity.

    • f1b0nacc1

      You haven’t met pigheaded ignorance until you have interacted with an Asian lefty….they make the Occupy crowd look like deep thinkers.

      • LA_Bob

        I realize you meant “Asian lefty” as in native-to-Asia, but I can’t resist conveying a deliciously delirious experience I had a few years ago.

        Some years back on KPFK, the Los Angeles member of the left-wing Pacifica network, there was a show about Korea by and for Koreans. The co-hosts where clearly young, hip, Korean-Americans. They totally botched the history of the Korean war, stating as though it was obvious as the day is long that the US had started the war by attacking North Korea.

        I was inclined to call into the station, but I realized there was no point.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2016 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service